Showing posts with label Bad Day at Black Rock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bad Day at Black Rock. Show all posts

Thursday, August 17, 2006

BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK (some commentary)


    1.  We talked about genres when viewing Bad Day at Black Rock. How to identify a genre? Like the old joke says, "If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and makes a noise like a duck, then it's a duck." The same with genres. If it looks like a Western, then it's a Western.
    2. So right away you realize that the more you learn about cinema (genres, actors, etc.) the more information you get in every shot. Because Bad Day at Black Rock looks like a Western.
    3. But wait a minute: Is Bad Day at Black Rock really a Western? Some things are missing: the gunfight, for example. But wait agan! There is a gunfight. Not quite the same way as other Westerns.
    4. So, you see, the film "toys" with the Western genre. And this is part of the "richness" of the movie.
    5. You might say the movie "toys" with the genre called War movie too (at the end, Spencer Tracy throws a gasoline bottle at the villain, like one would throw a grenade. (Remember, WWII has just ended and Spencer Tracy fought in that war and was saved by a Japanese-American soldier.) Is this part of that war? See how "meanings" accumulate as you watch a film. Later we're told the town looks like it's "all bombed out," another echo of a War movie.
    6. Notice I said "Spencer Tracy," not the character's name. This shows the importance of the star in movies. Still, you should try to find out the names of all the characters. Names may carry meaning.
    7. Imagine the movie without Spencer Tracy (once you get to know him). "Identification" might be equally shared between the bad and the good people. True, moral value in itself causes some identification, but probably not enough to "compel" identification. But a star with "compel" (force) identification. This saves the director time. Think about this: We could easily turn against Spencer Tracy's character for being so weak, even meek, in the beginning of the film. But that's impossible with Spencer Tracy himself. We don't care what he does. We are with him from the beginning of the movie. His point of view becomes our point of view.So the star system does not simply sell movies, it helps design movies too.
    8. We talked about the letter-box format. See how much would be lost by pan-and-scan? All those compositions would be broken up. We would not be seeing the director's movie, but someone else's movies. Nowadays, directors have it written in their contracts that when their movies are released on DVD, they must be shown in letter-box format.  (By the way, there's a pan-and-scan control on some DVD players, so you can compare the difference yourself!)
    9. Consider the title of the movie. What if the movie were called Justice in a Small Town instead of Bad Day at Black Rock? See the difference a title makes. The second title suggests Western ideas.
    10. This is also suggested by the framing (placement of camers, foregrounding rocks and hills).
    11. The title music also suggests a Western.
    12. Art direction (the dusty town, for example) suggests Westerns.
    13. Costume design (cowboy hats, cowboy boots) suggests Westerns.
    14. Generically (in terms of genres) the railroad has always been used as a symbol linking "civilization" (the American East) with the wilderness (both moral and geographical). John Ford uses the railroad like this in his Westerns: because the railroad always carries civilized values from the East to West. Before the railroad, law and order (from the East) would take a long time. After the RR, law and order could arrive fairly quickly. We studied the RR in terms of mise-en-scene and montage (editing of low angle shots of the RR, high angle shots of the RR, the RR penetrating the wilderness, like a powerful bullet, etc.). The RR, then, is both small and large, like Spencer Tracy himself.
    15. The RR is especially emphasized in story and set design later on. How? Well, nobody allows Spencer to drive. (We see tires at the very beginning of the film, under the framed window we noticed in our viewing.) Of course Tracy gets a car from the young girl. But we feel that the "motor" is a threat in any form in this still and dusty town.
    16. The movie is both a Western and not a Western. How so? Well, there's no real bad man in this film. There's just vicious men. Unlike Cowboy films, nobody risks anything here. They're just bullies. There are no gunfights, for example. A real good bad man (like Jack Palance in Shane) would be better than these cowardly bullies. These people are nobodies: losers only.
    17. The movie follows Aristotle's "unity of time": it takes place in a single day, moving from day to night, which is symbolic of the descent into darkness and evil. The "coda" or tail end of the movie, of course, takes us back to a new symbolic day, with the remaining characters willing to change, as the train takes Spencer Tracy away again, from wherever he came. So the film ends on a note of hope.
    18. Don't get too caught up in any single "meaning." Rather movies have a richness of meanings. For example, the young man (Pete, the brother of Liz) dressed in modern sytle (actually, the movie takes place just after WWII). This undercuts or "contradicts" the Western format. That's what I mean when I say, this is a Western, but not a Western (Westerns are usually dated by the closing of the Western frontier, in 1890, so roughly in the 19th century). Like I said, other factors also closed the "Western frontier" mentality (thinking, style of life, including the RR). Because once the RR arrived, the West was no longer that far from the East.
    19. A good example of "framing" is when the Sheriff is seen inside his own jail. In fact, Tracy thinks he's a jailbird (criminal) and is about to lock him in. But even without that action, such framing would suggest that the Sheriff is in fact a jailbird, or that there is no real difference, in this dusty town, between good and evil (the Sheriff is confused with a jailbird).
    20. The idea of a "dusty" town is further reinforced when we learn that the Japanese farmer managed to dig a well and obtain water. So values are reversed here: the white men are unable to change their own, while the Japanese can turn a wilderness into an oasis.

Framing (BAD DAY AT BLACK ROCK)

A question asked by a student about sequence shots should be clarified (made clear) too. I told this student that, though I used the term "sequence shot," in fact often a sequence shot is more complex than what I showed. As I told this student, probably a better term would have been "long take." (I refer to the shot where all the actors are sitting down, seemingly paralyzed with fear or apprehension.) A "long take" is a shot longer than usual, possibly of one minute or more (these terms are sometimes are definite). Now a sequence shot is a long take with a lot of camera movements, usually complex camera movements, tracking shots, pan shots, rearrangement of characters in the frame, etc. The reason I used the term "sequence shot" for that long take I just referred to is because in fact there are many characters in the frame, setting up a complex arrangement, like a sequence shot. But you'll see real sequence shots in this class, of course. By the way, don't confuse "sequence shot" and "shot sequence"! A shot sequence is a succession of shots, usually from long, medium, to closeup, a typical way to introduce a scene. For example, a long shot of a house, a closer shot of the man in front of the house, then a closeup of that man. These shot sequences are usually not especially noteworthy, but then there's the shot sequence in the horror classic, Frankenstein, where we first meet the monster in a series of quick shots ending in a dramatic closeup. We'll certainly study this sequence in our class!
    I would like to conclude with more ideas to help you enjoy this week's film.
    I talked about the water theme in the dusty town. The title suggests a contrast between a "rock" ("Black Rock") and the water the Japanese farmer finds in his well (a rock is a place where there is no water, unless you're Moses in the Bible).
   The final point I would like to make is the symbolism of karate in the film. Because the viewer assumes that Spencer Tracy learned karate from the Japanese man who saved his life in World War II. So there's a lot of rich meanings here: the dead soldier gets his revenge for the murder of his father by teaching his avenging angel, Spencer Tracy, the martial art that will effect that revenge. It's also ironic that an Asian art is used in a Western movie (instead of guns, horses, etc.), because the movie, of course, is about the issue of racism.
    As an historical note, students should know of the unfortunate internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, while America fought its war with Japan. So Bad Day at Black Rock works as a 1. Western, 2. War movie (in parts), and 3. Message film (about racism).
    So my final point is how Hollywood can make so many serious movies that don't seem serious to the viewer (most American viewers would probably have enjoyed this movie, at the time of its release, as no more than 1. entertainment, 2. a Spencer Tracy movie, 3. a wide-screen movie, 4. a Western. Yet the movie clearly makes a political statement, which, without its star and wide-screen format, would probably have been seen by only a handful of people, instead of tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of people.